State Agency Directory
|
Online Services
Office of the WV Attorney General
Patrick Morrisey
Menu
About
Meet the Attorney General
Welcome Message
Divisions
Appellate Division
Civil Rights Division
Consumer Protection and Anti-Trust Division
Education, Arts and Boards Division
Employee Programs and Workers Compensation Defense Division
Health and Human Resources Division
Tax and Revenue, Claims Commission and Transportation Division
Employment Opportunities
Consumer Protection
Public Events: Mobile Office Hours, Town Halls, Fairs & Festivals
IRS Phone Scam Information
Identity Theft Prevention
Fighting Substance Abuse
Prevention and Education
Prescription Drug Disposal Locations
Substance Abuse Treatment Services
Partnerships
Best Practices Project
Prescription Drug Abuse
Other Actions
External Resources
Price Gouging Laws
Senior Protection
Public Resources
Currently selected
Attorney General Opinions
2024 Opinions
2023 Opinions
2022 Opinions
2021 Opinions
2020 Opinions
2019 Opinions
2018 Opinions
2017 Opinions
2016 Opinions
2015 Opinions
2014 Opinions
2013 Opinions
Opinions of Previous Attorneys General 1986-2012
Proposed EPA Rules for New and Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants
FOIA Policy
Office of the Attorney General of West Virginia’s Investigation Into The DEA
Outside Counsel
Requests for Proposals & Written Determinations
Gun Reciprocity
Medicaid Fraud
Contact Us
Jobs
Consumer Protection Hotline:
1-800-368-8808
Senior Protection Hotline:
304-558-1155
Medicaid Fraud Hotline:
1-888-372-8398
Attorney General
>
Public Resources
>
Proposed EPA Rules for New and Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants
>
State of West Virginia, et al. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, No. 14-1146
State of West Virginia, et al. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, No. 14-1146
Page Content
Petition for Review by the State of
West Virginia (08-01-2014)
Supporting Documents
Federal Register Vol. 75 No. 250 — December 30, 2010: P
roposed Settlement Agreement, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit
EPA Legal Memorandum for Proposed Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants
Federal Register Vol. 79 No. 117 —
June 18, 2014: Publication of Proposed Rule, Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units
Court Scheduling Order In re: State of West Virginia, et al. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Motion to Intervene by the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Environmental Defense Fund (09-02-2014)
Motion to Intervene by the State of New York et al. (09-02-2014)
Motion for Extension of Time by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (09-03-2014)
Motion for Expedition by the State of West Virginia (09-03-2014)
Supporting Documents
Exhibit A: Settlement Agreement with EPA (December 20, 2010)
Exhibit B: Letter to EPA from the State of West Virginia (June 6, 2014)
Exhibit C: EPA Technical Support Document for Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units (June 2014)
Exhibit D: White Paper by Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP — State Implementation of CO2 Rules: Institutional and Practical Issues with State and Multi-State Implementation and Enforcement (July 2014)
Exhibit E: White Paper by the Center for the New Energy Economy at Colorado State University — A State Planning Guide for Clean Air Act Section 111(d) (July 2014)
Exhibit F: Coal-Dependent Arkansas Faces Stiff Emissions Target and a Running Clock,
National Geographic (August 19, 2014)
Exhibit G: Kentucky, Indiana Get Head Start on Global Warming Regs, Louisville Courier-Journal (June 13, 2014)
Exhibit H: Implications of Accelerated Power Plant Retirements, Energy Information Administration (April 28, 2014)
Exhibit I: A Carbon Dioxide Standard for Existing Power Plants: Impacts of the NDRC Proposal, Prepared for the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity by National Economic Research Associates, Inc. (March 2014)
Exhibit J: PJM Capacity Performance Proposal, PJM Interconnection (August 20, 2014)
State of West Virginia's Opposition to EPA's Motion to Extend Time to File Dispositive Motions (09-08-2014)
EPA's Opposition to Petitioner's Motion to Set a Consolidated Briefing Schedule and Expedite Consideration (09-18-2014)
The United States' Reply in Support of Motion to Extend Time to File Dispositive Motions and Record (09-18-2014)
State of West Virginia's Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Set a Consolidated Briefing Schedule and to Expedite Consideration (09-22-2014)
Court Order Denying State of West Virginia's Motion for Expedition and EPA's Motion to Extend Time (10-21-2014)
Briefing Order (11-4-2014)
Brief for Petitioners State of West Virginia, et al. (11-26-2014)
Exhibits
Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners (Trade Associations and Pacific Legal Foundation) (12-10-2014)
State of West Virginia’s joint motion concerning oral argument (2-23-2015)
Joint Appendix (2-27-2015)
State of West Virginia’s Final Opening Brief and Exhibits (3-4-2015)
EPA’s Final Response Brief (3-4-2015)
Final Intervenors’ Brief for State of New York, et al. (3-4-2015)
Final Intervenors’ Brief for the Sierra Club, et al. (3-4-2015)
State of West Virginia’s Final Reply Brief (3-4-2015)
Final Amicus Brief in Support of Respondent (NYU Institute for Policy Integrity) (3-4-2015)
Final Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners (Trade Associations and Pacific Legal Foundation) (3-4-2015)
EPA’s Response in Opposition to motion concerning oral argument (3-6-2015)
State of West Virginia’s Reply to motion concerning oral argument (3-11-2015)
State of West Virginia’s Rule 28(j) Letter (3-19-2015)
State of West Virginia’s Second Rule 28(j) Letter (4-15-2015)
Oral Argument Audio File (4-16-2015)
State of West Virginia’s Third Rule 28(j) Letter (4-24-2015)
Response of States Supporting EPA to WV’s Third 28(j) Letter (4-29-2015)
State of West Virginia's Fourth Rule 28(j) Letter (5-21-2015)
D.C. Circuit Opinion (6-9-2015)
Petition for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc or, Alternatively, Motion to Stay Mandate (7-24-15)
EPA’s Response in Opposition to Motion to Stay Mandate(8-6-15)
Reply to Response in Opposition to Motion to Stay Mandate (8-14-15)
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
AGO Web & FOIA Policies